We prioritise high-quality human evidence: randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. When only animal or cell-culture data exists, we say so plainly and treat the claim as preliminary. We do not present mechanisms or marketing as if they were proven outcomes.
Scientific statements are linked to their primary source — typically a study on PubMed, a DOI, or an official health authority. Citations are real and verified; we never invent or fabricate references. If we cannot find solid evidence for a popular claim, we tell you it is unproven.
Anti-Aging Daily is an independent publication, not a clinic. Articles are written and checked by Valeria Popova, bioengineer, against the primary studies they cite; they are not signed off by a physician before publication, and you will not see a “medically reviewed” badge on this site because it would not be true. Every health claim is instead tied to a source you can open yourself, with the strength of that source stated in plain language. Our content is educational and is never a substitute for individual medical advice — see our Medical Disclaimer.
Our editorial recommendations are not for sale. If an article ever contains affiliate links or sponsored content, it will be clearly disclosed and will never change our assessment of the evidence. We have no financial stake in any specific supplement brand.
Science changes, and so do we. If you spot an error, email our team and we will review it. Substantive corrections are noted with an updated date on the article.