>
Anti-AgingDaily
Editorial standards

Editorial & Fact-Checking Policy

Last updated: June 2026
Anti-Aging Daily publishes evidence-informed content about longevity, supplements, skin and healthy aging. This page explains exactly how we decide what to publish.

Evidence comes first

We prioritise high-quality human evidence: randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. When only animal or cell-culture data exists, we say so plainly and treat the claim as preliminary. We do not present mechanisms or marketing as if they were proven outcomes.

Every claim is sourced

Scientific statements are linked to their primary source — typically a study on PubMed, a DOI, or an official health authority. Citations are real and verified; we never invent or fabricate references. If we cannot find solid evidence for a popular claim, we tell you it is unproven.

Independent medical review

Articles covering health, supplements or anything that could affect a treatment decision are reviewed by a qualified medical professional before publication. Our content is educational and is never a substitute for individual medical advice — see our Medical Disclaimer.

Independence & transparency

Our editorial recommendations are not for sale. If an article ever contains affiliate links or sponsored content, it will be clearly disclosed and will never change our assessment of the evidence. We have no financial stake in any specific supplement brand.

Corrections

Science changes, and so do we. If you spot an error, email our team and we will review it. Substantive corrections are noted with an updated date on the article.